Landracing Forum

Tech Information => Safety => Topic started by: Dr Goggles on February 23, 2014, 12:16:15 AM

Title: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Dr Goggles on February 23, 2014, 12:16:15 AM
Hi all,
We have some I SO 6940 gloves,can anyone suggest what the equivalence to SFI is? They got knocked back last year,we just want to make sure they don't comply before we spend on a new pair.

Thanks in advance.

DrG.
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Dean Los Angeles on February 23, 2014, 08:49:40 AM
What you are asking is just what SCTA is trying to avoid.
By using SFI standards they are relying on the manufacturer to do all of the safety testing and that is the proof that allows the item to be used in SCTA competition.

Trying to relate an ISO standard 6940 to the FTM 191-1534 (Federal Test Method) for flame rating is not what the SCTA wants to do.

But it's more than that. The SFI standard also specifies construction methods for the gloves.

All you can do is provide the information that you have to the SCTA and pray for a a happy result.
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Dr Goggles on February 23, 2014, 11:00:55 AM
Thanks Dean.

I have a pair I can borrow if i cant buy some this week......I spoke to the head of tech, they need to be SFI.
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Stainless1 on February 24, 2014, 09:55:15 AM
You can wear those under the SFIs for added protection...
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Freud on February 24, 2014, 02:17:25 PM
Goggles............. I SO 6940 gloves are approved at the local slaughter house

and even adequate in the sausage room.

That is an "on high" recommendation even if they aren't FTM rated.

Bring them with you when you come to Speed Week in case you have to get a

job to raise money for the ticket home.

Anyone can get a job in the sausage line at anytime.

Illegals included.

FREUD
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: grumm441 on February 25, 2014, 01:28:04 AM
He could also wear one on his head so he look like a rooster
G
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Elmo Rodge on February 25, 2014, 06:16:18 AM
Quote from: grumm441 on February 25, 2014, 01:28:04 AM
He could also wear one on his head so he look like a rooster
G
Don't you think Gromit would recognize him?  :? Wayno
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Graham in Aus on February 25, 2014, 04:01:26 PM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v234/with_the_band/kewl/FeathersMcGraw.bmp)

:-D
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: Milwaukee Midget on February 25, 2014, 04:20:52 PM
Gloves are an easy get - it's trousers that can become an issue . . .

(http://i361.photobucket.com/albums/oo58/milwaukeemidget/wrongtrousers_zps6e3294ec.jpg) (http://s361.photobucket.com/user/milwaukeemidget/media/wrongtrousers_zps6e3294ec.jpg.html)
Title: Re: SFI v ISO Safety ratings
Post by: aussievetteracer on February 26, 2014, 04:01:43 AM
I just love "Wallace and Gromett"  No offence intended, but I believe most (all?) Land Speed Racers have a touch of the mad inventor in their genes.