Motorcycle Ground Clearance

Started by peterdallan, January 19, 2012, 03:46:10 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

peterdallan

Hi....again

I would like my bike to sit as low as possible but as a first timer I would like advice as to what people think or know is a safe ground clearance to build to as I understand the salt is not as smooth as it might appear in films and photos.

Thanks again


Peter

Stainless1

Peter, we may need more info... solid or suspension on the rear....
We ran the gsxr about 1 to 2 inches with the suspension set hard and damping at maximum.  Had over 180 lbs of ballast.... 380 if you count the rider  :-D
It lost a little bellypan paint when the crunchies were big
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

peterdallan

Apologies Stainless

Hard tailed frame with vintage Triumph Tele forks, so a couple of inches of movement up front. Based on a Triumph Thunderbird but lighter of course. Rider about 185 lbs

Peter

Stainless1

Weight is your friend at Bonneville, be sure to bring along some bolt on ballast.  Ballast = Traction
The numbers I gave you were for our partially streamlined bike.  Bounce the forks rider mounted, leave yourself about an inch of clearance.  The best bet is have a little adjustability, if the salt is bad you may need more clearance than when it is perfect.  You can let a little or a lot of fork stick our of the tree.
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

peterdallan

Ok thanks, that makes sense, I'll try to make sure I can adjust as necessary.

Thank you

Peter

Buzz Lightbeer

Peter will you be at the meeting next week?
Regards
Dave

peterdallan


bak189

If he is using a early Triumph Thunderbird engine, I don't think any ballast will be needed........50hp's maybe???..............sorry
Question authority.....always

Vinsky

At what horsepower range do you need to start adding balast? Or at what speeds?
John

Nortonist 592

Quote from: bak189 on January 24, 2012, 07:05:11 AM
If he is using a early Triumph Thunderbird engine, I don't think any ballast will be needed........50hp's maybe???..............sorry

I thought an early Triumph Thunderbird would be considered ballast.


Sorry.  I couldn't resist. : - )
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.

Glen

Glen
Crew on Turbinator II

South West, Utah

Nortonist 592

Sorry Glen.  It was a bit like someone handing you a $50 bill.  It was irresistible.
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.

Stainless1

OK, so maybe no extra ballast will be necessary.... Our experience was at speeds above 175, might not see that with 50 hp. 
Stainless
Red Hat 228.039, 2001, 65ci, Bockscar Lakester #1000 with a little N2O

55chevr


Nortonist 592

Early Triumph Tbird.  HP in the 50s is about right if you want it to stay together.
Get off the stove Grandad.  You're too old to be riding the range.