How were the 2016 courses? a Poll

Started by Milwaukee Midget, August 23, 2016, 09:53:29 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

How were the 2016 courses?

Excellent - I wouldn't hesitate to race on it again
0 (0%)
Good - A typical year to the best of my knowledge and experience
2 (2.5%)
Fair - Neither good nor bad
10 (12.5%)
Poor - Track related issues limited our experience and/or caused us to leave early
19 (23.8%)
Very poor - If I had known it was going to be this bad, I'd have left the car/bike on the trailer
4 (5%)
I did not race at Speedweek, 2016, but I'd like to be able to view the vote count
45 (56.3%)

Total Members Voted: 79

Voting closed: September 02, 2016, 10:06:23 PM

Print
Go Down Pages1
User actions

Milwaukee Midget

August 23, 2016, 09:53:29 PM Last Edit: August 23, 2016, 10:10:02 PM by Milwaukee Midget
This poll is intended to provide a degree of quantifiable feedback as to the conditions at Speedweek, 2016.

I ask the following -

1 Only vote if you actually raced there for the 2016 Speedweek event.
2 Consider your answer carefully, as once you have cast your vote, you will not be able to change it.
3 You will only be able to view the vote count after you have voted.  If you did not participate in Speedweek, 2016, and wish to view the count, vote for Option 6, but be aware that once you've chosen Option 6, you will not be able to change your vote.
  It is a function of the polling system on this platform.
4 If you would like to make additional comments regarding the salt for Speedweek, 2016, click here, and you will be able to post comments there  http://www.landracing.com/forum/index.php/topic,16256.0.html

We'll run it for 10 days and close it out on September 2nd.

Thanks.

"Problems are almost always a sign of progress."  Harold Bettes
Well, I guess we're making a LOT of progress . . .  :roll:
Print
Go Up Pages1
User actions